Simona Ogescu vs Najah Dawson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 Jul at 01:36 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Ogescu vs N. Dawson

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ogescu 1 - 0 Dawson
They have played 3 sets in total, with Simona Ogescu winning 2 and Najah Dawson winning 1. The last match between Simona Ogescu and Najah Dawson was at the W15 Cluj Napoca, 31-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Simona Ogescu getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ogescu | 1 |
| Dawson | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Cluj Napoca(07-31-25)
S. Ogescu vs N. Dawson H2H Profile
S. Ogescu vs N. Dawson Match Preview:
- How does Dawson's second serve compare to Ogescu's? Dawson has won 42.02% of second serve points in recent months, outperforming Ogescu's 36.51%.
- In return games, Ogescu leads with 52.13% success on opponents' second serves, compared to Dawson's 48.48%.
- For first serve returns, Ogescu has a slight edge with 27.79% over Dawson's 27.62%.
- Who handles pressure better? Ogescu shows a better breakpoint save percentage at 54.35%, surpassing Dawson's 46.43%.
- In terms of match wins over the past year, Ogescu leads with a 62.5% win rate versus Dawson's 61.11%.
- Both players excel on clay, but Ogescu has a higher win percentage at 55% compared to Dawson's 52%.
- Both athletes have a similar win record at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, but Ogescu played more matches, hinting at more experience.
- The average rank of Dawson's opponents (113.22) has been significantly higher than Ogescu's (271.7), indicating Dawson faced tougher competitors.
- In terms of breakpoint conversions, Ogescu is more efficient with 42.37% of opportunities seized compared to Dawson's 34.62%.
Editorial Prediction (July 31, 2025, UTC):
Assessing recent performance stats, Dawson has demonstrated superior service game proficiency, particularly with their second serve.
Ogescu, however, exhibits stronger return game capability and a higher breakpoint conversion rate, which could be vital in seizing crucial opportunities.
While Dawson has competed against higher-ranked opponents, Ogescu's solid win record and breakpoint efficiency suggest a slight advantage.
Taking all factors into account, including experience level and pressure handling, Ogescu appears to have a modest edge and is the probable winner of this matchup.
Simona Ogescu vs Najah Dawson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Ogescu vs N. Dawson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 2:40:51 | Average Match Time | 2:40:51 |
| 52% (51/99) | 1st Serve % | 57% (56/98) |
| 65% (33/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (34/56) |
| 50% (24/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (19/42) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 46% (45/98) | Return Points Win % | 42% (42/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Ogescu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-7 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
N. Dawson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 4-6 4-0 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 2-0 ret. | ||

S. Ogescu vs N. Dawson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.25% (142/115) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.50% (17/23) |
| 54.31% (309/260) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.24% (38/46) |
| 52.76% (2697/2415) | Games Win/Loss | 49.09% (350/363) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 55.56% (140/112) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.83% (11/12) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 300 | Aces Total | 29 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 591 | Total Double Faults | 53 |
| 1:10:21 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 365.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 217.97 |
| 55% (6143/11201) | 1st Serve % | 61% (585/956) |
| 60% (3709/6143) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (371/585) |
| 43% (2163/5058) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (177/371) |
| 47% (651/1373) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (46/105) |
| 46% (5020/10972) | Return Points Win % | 43% (399/934) |
| 54.90% (28/23) | Challenger W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 55.34% (114/92) | Futures W/L | 46.67% (14/16) |
| 55% (138/252) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (17/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (21/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 50% (30/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 91% (139/126) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (19/17) |
| 9% (139/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (19/2) |
| 13% (118/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (21/0) |